Up the Amazon Without a Paddle: Examining Sales Taxes, Entity Isolation, and the “Affiliate Tax”

Download Full Text PDF

Volume 11, Issue 2 (Jun 2012)

As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Quill v. North Dakota, unless a retailer has a physical presence in a state, it is not obliged to collect sales taxes in that state. In order to avoid collecting sales taxes, many companies like Amazon.com have set up subsidiary companies in many states to ship, but not sell, goods to customers. This tactic is called entity isolation. In response, states are creating legislation, commonly, but inaccurately, called an “affiliate tax,” which provides that if a company makes a certain amount of money through an affiliate’s presence in the state, it is deemed to have legal physical presence and is required to collect sales taxes. This Recent Development discusses how Quill has reacted to the Internet age, the possibility of states cutting through entity isolation, and the constitutionality of the so- called “affiliate tax.”

Michael R. Gordon, Recent Development, Up the Amazon Without a Paddle: Examining Sales Taxes, Entity Isolation, and the “Affiliate Tax”, 11 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 299 (2010), available at http://ncjolt.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/14_11NCJLTech2992009-2010.pdf.

The North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology has adopted the Open Access Program, a part of the Scholar’s Copyright Project created by Science Commons. Authors designate the conditions under which their articles are licensed. By downloading articles, you agree to comply with the license terms specified. Please contact NC JOLT at eic.ncjolt@gmail.com with permissions inquiries.