United States v. Cassidy: The Federal Interstate Stalking Statute and Freedom of Speech

Download Full Text PDF

Stalking is a crime that affects millions of people each year, with profound mental, physical, and financial effects for victims. In a technological world, new forms of stalking arose through online interactive mediums such as Twitter, blogs, Facebook, and email. Cyberstalking has many of the same ramifications as traditional stalking but with some new twists. As shown in United States v. Cassidy, activity that would be considered stalking, if done offline, may be protected speech if accomplished through an online medium. In Cassidy, the court found the federal interstate stalking statute, which makes many forms of cyberstalking illegal, unconstitutional as applied to tweets and blog postings about a public, religious leader. This Recent Development considers the ramifications of Cassidy on cyberstalking laws and argues that these laws must be reexamined in light of First Amendment protections. Specifically, it argues that the best possible solutions to protect stalking victims may, in fact, be extralegal rather than legal in nature.

Timothy L. Allsup, Recent Development, United States v. Cassidy: The Federal Interstate Stalking Statute and Freedom of Speech, 13 N.C. J.L. & Tech. On. 227 (2012), http://cite.ncjolt.org/13NCJOLTOnlineEd227.

The North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology has adopted the Open Access Program, a part of the Scholar’s Copyright Project created by Science Commons. Authors designate the conditions under which their articles are licensed. By downloading articles, you agree to comply with the license terms specified. Please contact NC JOLT at eic.ncjolt@gmail.com with permissions inquiries.