Juries in U.S. Patent Cases: A Comparative Portrait of the Boundaries of Democracy

“It is clear that juries will necessarily differ in ‘competence,’ but it is at best incongruous to suggest that a society that sends its citizens routinely into space could never produce a jury competent to determine a case some judge might consider too ‘complex’ for people with ‘common experience’ to decide.”

  • Author: M. Neil Browne, Nancy K. Kubasek, and Alex Q. Jacobs
  • Cite: M. Neil Brown et al., Juries in U.S. Patent Cases: A Comparative Portrait of the Boundaries of Democracy, 20 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 199 (2018), http://ncjolt.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/KubasekFinal.pdf.
  • PDF: http://ncjolt.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/KubasekFinal.pdf
  • Volume: Volume 20, Issue 2

The North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology has adopted the Open Access Program, a part of the Scholar’s Copyright Project created by Science Commons. Authors designate the conditions under which their articles are licensed. By downloading articles, you agree to comply with the license terms specified. Please contact NC JOLT at eic.ncjolt@gmail.com with permissions inquiries.