In the Navy: The Future Strength of Preliminary Injunctions Under NEPA in Light of NRDC v. Winter

Download Full Text PDF

Volume 10, Issue 2 (Jun 2012)

A preliminary injunction is an incredibly useful and important tool in cases involving the enforcement of environmental statutes and regulations. Parties hoping to protect the environment will often seek preliminary injunctions to prevent environmental harm from occurring while the case is being litigated in court. In Winter v. National Resource Defense Council (NRDC), the Supreme Court held that a lower court acted improperly in issuing a preliminary injunction that placed restrictions on the Navy’s ability to conduct training exercises off the coast of southern California. The Court’s decision in this case is improper and calls into question the efficacy of preliminary injunctions in future environmental enforcement cases, especially when it comes to cases brought against the military. In cases like this one, the Court should adopt a new approach in reviewing preliminary injunctions that will uphold the power and meaning of environmental protection laws.

William Krueger, Recent Development, In the Navy: The Future Strength of Preliminary Injunctions Under NEPA in Light of NRDC v. Winter, 10 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 423 (2009), available at http://ncjolt.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/15_10NCJLTech4232008-2009.pdf.

The North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology has adopted the Open Access Program, a part of the Scholar’s Copyright Project created by Science Commons. Authors designate the conditions under which their articles are licensed. By downloading articles, you agree to comply with the license terms specified. Please contact NC JOLT at eic.ncjolt@gmail.com with permissions inquiries.