Ghost in the “New Machine”: How Alice Exposed Software Patenting’s Category Mistake

Download Full Text PDF

Volume 16, Issue 4 (Jul 2015)

The Alice Court’s characterization of computer programming has effectively repudiated, inter alia, the doctrine that programming a general-purpose computer creates a patent-eligible “new machine.” This Article revisits In re Bernhart, the first holding based on the “new machine” principle, concluding that the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals committed a category mistake in conducting its nonobviousness analysis. This suggests that § 101 has a unique role to play in ensuring the analytical coherence of the other tests for patentability, and that step two of the Mayo/Alice test could helpfully enforce the doctrinal distinction between a patent-eligible “method or means” and an unpatentable “result or effect.”

Andrew Chin, Ghost in the "New Machine": How Alice Exposed Software Patenting's Category Mistake, 16 N.C.J.L. & Tech. 623 (2015), available at http://ncjolt.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Chin_Final.pdf.

The North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology has adopted the Open Access Program, a part of the Scholar’s Copyright Project created by Science Commons. Authors designate the conditions under which their articles are licensed. By downloading articles, you agree to comply with the license terms specified. Please contact NC JOLT at eic.ncjolt@gmail.com with permissions inquiries.