Do Not Read This Article at Work: The CFAA’s Vagueness Problem and Recent Legislative Attempts to Correct It

Download Full Text PDF

Volume 15, Online Edition (May 2014)

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), the nation’s leading anti-hacking statute, criminalizes unauthorized access to any computer in the world. The CFAA does not specify what types of computer use qualify as unauthorized access, and circuit courts are split over approaches to defining the term. Although some courts have held that violations of private contracts such as employment agreements or website Terms of Service agreements constitute unauthorized access to a computer, others have held that such a broad reading renders the CFAA unconstitutionally vague. In the past year, lawmakers have introduced bills to clarify the conduct prohibited by the CFAA. Although each proposal narrows the scope of the CFAA, only one—Aaron’s Law—provides sufficient clarity to correct the CFAA’s vagueness problem.

Ryan H. Niland, Recent Development, Do Not Read This Article at Work: The CFAA's Vagueness Problem and Recent Legislative Attempts to Correct It, 15 N.C. J.L. & Tech. On. 134 (2014), available at http://ncjolt.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Niland_Final.pdf

The North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology has adopted the Open Access Program, a part of the Scholar’s Copyright Project created by Science Commons. Authors designate the conditions under which their articles are licensed. By downloading articles, you agree to comply with the license terms specified. Please contact NC JOLT at eic.ncjolt@gmail.com with permissions inquiries.