September 10, 2019
The Battle of the Verbs: The Ninth Circuit’s Reconciliation of “Verbing” with Trademark Law and Practices
In its recent decision in Elliot v. Google, the Ninth Circuit reinforced Google’s trademark significance against claims that the mark “google” should be canceled under the Lanham Act due to the public’s verb usage of the trademark. The public’s “verbing” of popular marks has become a particularly onerous problem for internet and technology trademark owners like Google, who want to encourage their products’ integration into pop culture while still maintaining control of their mark. The court’s holding that evidence of verb usage, without more, is not sufficient to prove that the trademark has succumbed to genericide is a step in the right direction in reconciling older trademark practices with modern language use and the evolving realities of internet marketing.
Taylor Carrere, The Battle of the Verbs: The Ninth Circuit's Reconciliation of "Verbing" with Trademark Law and Practices, 19 N.C.J.L. & Tech. 33 (2018), available at http://ncjolt.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Carrere_Final.pdf.
The North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology has adopted the Open Access Program, a part of the Scholar’s Copyright Project created by Science Commons. Authors designate the conditions under which their articles are licensed. By downloading articles, you agree to comply with the license terms specified. Please contact NC JOLT at email@example.com with permissions inquiries.